We are searching data for your request:

**Forums and discussions:**

**Manuals and reference books:**

**Data from registers:**

**Wait the end of the search in all databases.**

Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

## Nernst's law of distribution

The basis of the separation of mixtures of substances by chromatographic methods is the different distribution of the individual substances between two phases. First of all, the distribution of a substance between two phases should be considered:

If two phases α and β, both of which contain substance B in solution, are in equilibrium with one another,

- $${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}={\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}$$

the following applies to component B at constant temperature and constant pressure:

- $${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\alpha}}+\mathrm{R.}T\cdot ln\phantom{\rule{0.1ex}{0ex}}({a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}})={\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\beta}}+\mathrm{R.}T\cdot ln\phantom{\rule{0.1ex}{0ex}}({a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}})$$

whereby ${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}$ and ${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}$ the chemical potentials of substance B are in phase α or β, while ${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\alpha}}$ and ${\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\beta}}$ represent the standard potentials at infinite dilution as a reference value. ${a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}$ and ${a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}$ are the activities of substance B in relation to this standard state. Forming gives you

- $$ln\phantom{\rule{0.1ex}{0ex}}\left(\frac{{a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}}{{a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}}\right)=\frac{{\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\beta}}-{\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\alpha}}}{\mathrm{R.}T}$$

or

- $$\frac{{a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}}{{a}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}}={\text{e}}^{\left(\frac{{\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\beta}}-{\mu}_{\text{B.}}^{0\text{\alpha}}}{\mathrm{R.}T}\right)}=\text{const.}$$

In the case of ideally dilute solutions, these activities can be replaced by the mole fractions and Nernst's distribution theorem is obtained.

- $$\frac{{x}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}}{{x}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}}=\text{const.}=k$$

In the case of ideally dilute solutions, this ratio of the mole fractions in the two phases is constant under given external conditions. It is therefore independent of the absolute amount of the dissolved substance in the respective phase. With sufficient dilution, the mole fractions can approximately be replaced by the concentrations.

- $$\frac{{c}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\alpha}}}{{c}_{\text{B.}}^{\text{\beta}}}=k$$

The fact that a dissolved substance is divided into two phases in a ratio that is characteristic of it, regardless of its concentration, can be used to separate substance mixtures. This is used in chromatographic separation processes and in the so-called multiple extraction according to Craig.

## 3 answers

Your guess is correct, but you shouldn't forget the dimensions (-)))

& quotAt equilibrium 1 this is therefore 400** ° C** and 20

**, and thus almost 40**

__bar__**& quot**

__%__Okay, thank you very much - but do I only have to "read" the value that "matches" the two specified dates? We only recently started on the subject - that's why I assumed that invoices would still be necessary here.

That means, for equilibrium II it would be - & quot; for equilibrium 2 this is consequently 400** ° C** and 60

**, and thus at just under 65**

__bar__

__% & quot?__By the way, that's a so-called **Characteristic diagram**.

Here it is the characteristics of the **Volume part** from NH_{3} in% depending on the **temperature**. **parameter** for the individual characteristics is the **pressure**

Right. You go straight up at the desired temperature and then get intersections with the isobars. At the point of intersection with the specified isobar, go horizontally to the left and read off the yield ordinate.

formally correct, but with this order of magnitude of the pressure at least & quot; need to be accepted & quot (-)))

## Macroscopy (physics)

In physics, a distinction is made between microscopic and macroscopic observation.

### Further recommended specialist knowledge

#### Safe weighing range to ensure accurate results

#### What is the right way to check repeatability on balances?

#### Guide to Basic Laboratory Skills

At a **macroscopic observation** If one does not derive the behavior of a system from the behavior of its smallest components, one considers meaningful statistical values (e.g. mean values).

An example is the gas (air) in a balloon. Describing the trajectories of the individual molecules (nitrogen, oxygen,.) Using the means of classical physics would be of little help. Given the huge number of particles, this approach is futile.

Instead, one leads z. B. the temperature as a measure of the mean kinetic energy of the particles. This is justified because the energy is statistically evenly distributed over all degrees of freedom. This assumption of uniform distribution is always better fulfilled with an increasing number of particles, in the ideal case of an infinite number of particles it is even perfect. The actual distribution of the energy (number of particles with one energy *E.*) gives the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in classical physics and the Fermi-Dirac statistics and Bose-Einstein statistics in quantum mechanics.

With this approach, the description of the system is reduced to a few macroscopic quantities such as temperature, pressure, density, etc., which we are already familiar with from everyday life. In fact, there is e.g. B. the atmosphere of the earth made up of individual molecules. Their individual interaction (which one even has to describe correctly in terms of quantum mechanics) becomes insignificant due to the large number of effects.

The very large number of particles in everyday systems, all of which are meaningfully described macroscopically, has the advantage that statistical methods can be applied with very high precision (see also statistical physics).

But you don't always have to proceed statistically. For example, a huge system like a planet or a sun can be traced back to a mass point (microscopic) in the description (a sphere with a concentric density distribution behaves like a mass point from the point of view of gravity).

Physics is very successful and generally applicable where it describes either simple, microscopic systems or very large, macroscopic systems. In contrast, generally valid statements are difficult for systems with “few” parts. So there is e.g. B. no closed solution for the movement of three mass points (three-body problem). In such cases, numerical computer models can usually help.

## Exercises

Is it a qualitative characteristic with an ordinal scale? (Grades in a class test) (interest in soccer) (! Pet) (! Desired title) (! Gender) (! Hobby) (! Favorite color) (! Occupation) (! Marital status) (! Denomination) (! Age in years) ( ! Salary) (! Shoe size) (! Number of seats)

Is it a qualitative characteristic with a nominal scale? (Pet) (Preferred title) (Gender) (Hobby) (Favorite color) (Profession) (Denomination) (! Grades in a class test) (! Interest in football) (! Age in years) (! Salary) (! Shoe size) (! Number of seats) (! Fruit juice content of apple juice)

Is it a quantitative characteristic with a metric discrete scale? (Age in years) (Salary in full EUR) (Number of seats) (! Grades in a class test) (! Interest in soccer) (! Favorite color) (! Profession) (! Marital status) (! Denomination) (! Fruit juice content of apple juice) (! Prescription in diopters) (! Cruising speed for airplanes) (! Temperature in degrees Celsius) (! Water level of the Ruhr in Hattingen)

Is it a quantitative characteristic with a metric continuous scale? (Fruit juice content of apple juice) (Eyesight in dioptres) (Airplane cruising speed) (Temperature in degrees Celsius) (Water level in the Ruhr in Hattingen) (! Grades in a class test) (! Interest in soccer) (! Pet) (! Desired title) ( ! Gender) (! Hobby) (! Favorite color) (! Profession) (! Marital status) (! Denomination) (! Age in years) (! Salary in full EUR) (! Number of seats)

## Mnemonics

Congratulations! You have successfully completed the first chapter.

Your rulebook already contains a lot of information. Make sure you wrote everything down.

One **Population** is the set of all possible objects about which one would like to make a statement.

- limited (e.g. all students in class HHU5 at the Hattingen vocational college), - very large (e.g. all residents of Germany in 2014) or - unlimited.

One **sample** is a subset of the population, its size is always limited.

Every question examined in a statistical survey is called **characteristic** .

The individual answers are called **Observation values** and are separated according to characteristics in a **Original list** held. The observation values are given with a i < displaystyle a_*> referred to.*

* *

*Each element of the sample of a statistical survey is a Feature carrier based on the characteristics examined.*

## Fermi-Dirac statistics

**Fermi-Dirac statistics**, *Fermi statistics*, Quantum statistics for a many-body system consisting of fermions and in equilibrium. In contrast to the classical Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics, here, due to the quantum mechanical indistinguishability of the particles, states that differ only through the exchange of two similar particles are identical and must not be counted as different. The main difference between the Fermi-Dirac statistics and the Bose-Einstein statistics is that the occupation numbers of the individual states, which are unlimited there, can only assume the values 0 and 1 here. This is a consequence of the Pauli principle (fermions), according to which two or more fermions can never be in the same quantum state. An ideal Fermi gas, i.e. a system of fermions that do not interact with one another, satisfies the Fermi-Dirac distribution

. It is

the mean number of particles in the state *i* with the energy *E. _{i}*,

*k*

_{B.}the Boltzmann constant and

*T*the absolute temperature (Fig. 1). The chemical potential

*μ*is determined implicitly from the equation

, i.e. the sum of the particle numbers, summed up over all states

*i*, is equal to the total number of particles

*N*. In the Fermi-Dirac statistics, the chemical potential can also have positive values.

*G*is the statistical weight of the state

_{i}*i*, i.e. the number of quantum states with the energy

*E.*. In most applications you are dealing with fermions with a spin 1/2, e.g. with electrons. It then applies

_{i}*G*= 2 according to the two different spin orientations per energy state.

_{i}In the event of *E. _{i}* –

*μ*

*k*

_{B.}

*T*one can neglect the 1 in the denominator, and the Fermi distribution goes over into the Boltzmann distribution. If the above condition is not met, the properties of the gas deviate from the classic ideal gas, and gas degeneration occurs. The course of the occupation number of the individual levels as a function of the energy, omitting the factor

*G*, so the function

_{i}

shows the following behavior: At low temperatures, i.e. with severe degeneration, the fermions predominantly occupy the lower energy states, while the higher energy states are practically empty, with the transition between occupied and empty energy levels in the proximity of the chemical potential depends on the corresponding temperature. In the borderline case *T* = 0 are all states below the chemical potential with two each (f & # 252r *G _{i}* = 2) Fermions occupy the states above the chemical potential, the limit value of which is f & # 252r

*T*= 0 because of this property also as Fermi energy

*E.*

_{F.}are denoted are empty. This means that the mean energy of the fermions does not vanish even at absolute zero, it has a finite value (Fig. 2). For free particles, the Fermischen limit energy corresponds to a limit momentum

*p*

_{F.}. All fermions in the system have momentum at absolute zero

. This inequality describes a sphere in momentum space which

*Fermi sphere*. The number of unequal momentum states within the Fermi sphere is (4 & # 960

*p*

_{F.}3 / 3)

*V*/

*H*3, is there

*V*the given volume of the Fermi gas.

The application of the Fermi-Dirac statistics to the electron gas in metals is of particular importance, because this is already in a state of severe degeneration at normal temperatures. The Fermi-Dirac statistics allow practical statements about the metal properties, for example the derivation of Richardson's law of electron emission at glow cathodes. The specific heats of the electrons calculated by means of the Fermi-Dirac statistics could also be confirmed experimentally. At very low temperatures, the electrons provide most of the specific heat of the metal. The specific heats disappear for you *T*

0 in accordance with the third law of thermodynamics.

The Fermi-Dirac statistics were proposed for electrons by E. Fermi in 1926. Shortly afterwards, P.A.M. Dirac, who uncovered its connection with quantum theory. The first application of the Fermi-Dirac statistics to the electron gas in metals was carried out by W. Pauli and A. Sommerfeld.

**Fermi-Dirac statistic 1:** Fermi-Dirac distribution for & # 252r *T* = 0 and *k*_{B.}*T* = (1 / 5)*μ*. Both curves intersect *f*(*E.*) = 1 / 2.

**Fermi-Dirac statistic 2:** Fermi-Dirac distribution for a gas in three dimensions, measured for different temperatures and *E.*_{F.} / *k*_{B.} = 50,000 K. Note that & # 223 the curves are not at *f*(*E.*) = Cut 1/2.

### Reader opinion

If you have any comments on the content of this article, you can inform the editors by e-mail. We read your letter, but we ask for your understanding that we cannot answer every one.

Staff Volumes I and II

Silvia Barnert

Dr. Matthias Delbrück

Dr. Reinald ice cream

Natalie Fischer

Walter Greulich (editor)

Carsten Heinisch

Sonja Nagel

Dr. Gunnar Radons

MS (Optics) Lynn Schilling-Benz

Dr. Joachim Schüller

Christine Weber

Ulrich Kilian

The author's abbreviation is in square brackets, the number in round brackets is the subject area number, a list of subject areas can be found in the foreword.

Katja Bammel, Berlin [KB2] (A) (13)

Prof. Dr. W. Bauhofer, Hamburg (B) (20, 22)

Sabine Baumann, Heidelberg [SB] (A) (26)

Dr. Günther Beikert, Viernheim [GB1] (A) (04, 10, 25)

Prof. Dr. Hans Berckhemer, Frankfurt [HB1] (A, B) (29)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Bethge, Frankfurt (B) (18)

Prof. Tamás S. Biró, Budapest [TB2] (A) (15)

Dr. Thomas Bührke, Leimen [TB] (A) (32)

Angela Burchard, Geneva [AB] (A) (20, 22)

Dr. Matthias Delbrück, Dossenheim [MD] (A) (12, 24, 29)

Dr. Wolfgang Eisenberg, Leipzig [WE] (A) (15)

Dr. Frank Eisenhaber, Heidelberg [FE] (A) (27 Essay Biophysics)

Dr. Roger Erb, Kassel [RE1] (A) (33)

Dr. Angelika Fallert-Müller, Groß-Zimmer [AFM] (A) (16, 26)

Dr. Andreas Faulstich, Oberkochen [AF4] (A) (Essay Adaptive Optics)

Prof. Dr. Rudolf Feile, Darmstadt (B) (20, 22)

Stephan Fichtner, Dossenheim [SF] (A) (31)

Dr. Thomas Filk, Freiburg [TF3] (A) (10, 15)

Natalie Fischer, Dossenheim [NF] (A) (32)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Fredenhagen, Hamburg [KF2] (A) (Essay Algebraic Quantum Field Theory)

Thomas Fuhrmann, Heidelberg [TF1] (A) (14)

Christian Fulda, Heidelberg [CF] (A) (07)

Frank Gabler, Frankfurt [FG1] (A) (22 essay data processing systems for future high-energy and heavy-ion experiments)

Dr. Harald Genz, Darmstadt [HG1] (A) (18)

Michael Gerding, Kühlungsborn [MG2] (A) (13)

Andrea Greiner, Heidelberg [AG1] (A) (06)

Uwe Grigoleit, Göttingen [UG] (A) (13)

Prof. Dr. Michael Grodzicki, Salzburg [MG1] (A, B) (01, 16 essay density functional theory)

Prof. Dr. Hellmut Haberland, Freiburg [HH4] (A) (Essay Cluster Physics)

Dr. Andreas Heilmann, Chemnitz [AH1] (A) (20, 21)

Carsten Heinisch, Kaiserslautern [CH] (A) (03)

Dr. Hermann Hinsch, Heidelberg [HH2] (A) (22)

Jens Hoerner, Hanover [JH] (A) (20)

Dr. Dieter Hoffmann, Berlin [DH2] (A, B) (02)

Renate Jerecic, Heidelberg [RJ] (A) (28)

Dr. Ulrich Kilian, Hamburg [UK] (A) (19)

Thomas Kluge, Mainz [TK] (A) (20)

Achim Knoll, Strasbourg [AK1] (A) (20)

Andreas Kohlmann, Heidelberg [AK2] (A) (29)

Dr. Barbara Kopff, Heidelberg [BK2] (A) (26)

Dr. Bernd Krause, Karlsruhe [BK1] (A) (19)

Ralph Kühnle, Heidelberg [RK1] (A) (05)

Dr. Andreas Markwitz, Dresden [AM1] (A) (21)

Holger Mathiszik, Bensheim [HM3] (A) (29)

Mathias Mertens, Mainz [MM1] (A) (15)

Dr. Dirk Metzger, Mannheim [DM] (A) (07)

Dr. Rudi Michalak, Warwick, UK [RM1] (A) (23)

Helmut Milde, Dresden [HM1] (A) (09 Essay Acoustics)

Guenter Milde, Dresden [GM1] (A) (12)

Maritha Milde, Dresden [MM2] (A) (12)

Dr. Christopher Monroe, Boulder, USA [CM] (A) (Essay Atom and Ion Traps)

Dr. Andreas Müller, Kiel [AM2] (A) (33 Essay Everyday Physics)

Dr. Nikolaus Nestle, Regensburg [NN] (A) (05)

Dr. Thomas Otto, Geneva [TO] (A) (06 Essay Analytical Mechanics)

Prof. Dr. Harry Paul, Berlin [HP] (A) (13)

Cand. Phys. Christof Pflumm, Karlsruhe [CP] (A) (06, 08)

Prof. Dr. Ulrich Platt, Heidelberg [UP] (A) (Essay Atmosphere)

Dr. Oliver Probst, Monterrey, Mexico [OP] (A) (30)

Dr. Roland Andreas Puntigam, Munich [RAP] (A) (14 Essay General Theory of Relativity)

Dr. Gunnar Radons, Mannheim [GR1] (A) (01, 02, 32)

Prof. Dr. Günter Radons, Stuttgart [GR2] (A) (11)

Oliver Rattunde, Freiburg [OR2] (A) (16 essay cluster physics)

Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren, Göttingen [KHR] (A) (Essay Algebraic Quantum Field Theory)

Ingrid Reiser, Manhattan, USA [IR] (A) (16)

Dr. Uwe Renner, Leipzig [UR] (A) (10)

Dr. Ursula Resch-Esser, Berlin [URE] (A) (21)

Prof. Dr. Hermann Rietschel, Karlsruhe [HR1] (A, B) (23)

Dr. Peter Oliver Roll, Mainz [OR1] (A, B) (04, 15 essay distributions)

Hans-Jörg Rutsch, Heidelberg [HJR] (A) (29)

Dr. Margit Sarstedt, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK [MS2] (A) (25)

Rolf Sauermost, Waldkirch [RS1] (A) (02)

Prof. Dr. Arthur Scharmann, Giessen (B) (06, 20)

Dr. Arne Schirrmacher, Munich [AS5] (A) (02)

Christina Schmitt, Freiburg [CS] (A) (16)

Cand. Phys. Jörg Schuler, Karlsruhe [JS1] (A) (06, 08)

Dr. Joachim Schüller, Mainz [JS2] (A) (10 essay analytical mechanics)

Prof. Dr. Heinz-Georg Schuster, Kiel [HGS] (A, B) (11 essay Chaos)

Richard Schwalbach, Mainz [RS2] (A) (17)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Stierstadt, Munich [KS] (A, B) (07, 20)

Cornelius Suchy, Brussels [CS2] (A) (20)

William J. Thompson, Chapel Hill, USA [WYD] (A) (Essay Computers in Physics)

Dr. Thomas Volkmann, Cologne [TV] (A) (20)

Dipl.-Geophys. Rolf vom Stein, Cologne [RVS] (A) (29)

Patrick Voss-de Haan, Mainz [PVDH] (A) (17)

Thomas Wagner, Heidelberg [TW2] (A) (29 essay atmosphere)

Manfred Weber, Frankfurt [MW1] (A) (28)

Markus Wenke, Heidelberg [MW3] (A) (15)

Prof. Dr. David Wineland, Boulder, USA [DW] (A) (Essay Atom and Ion Traps)

Dr. Harald Wirth, Saint Genis-Pouilly, F [HW1] (A) (20) Steffen Wolf, Freiburg [SW] (A) (16)

Dr. Michael Zillgitt, Frankfurt [MZ] (A) (02)

Prof. Dr. Helmut Zimmermann, Jena [HZ] (A) (32)

Dr. Kai Zuber, Dortmund [KZ] (A) (19)

Dr. Ulrich Kilian (responsible)

Christine Weber

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann, Berlin

The author's abbreviation is in square brackets, the number in round brackets is the subject area number, a list of subject areas can be found in the foreword.

Markus Aspelmeyer, Munich [MA1] (A) (20)

Dr. Katja Bammel, Cagliari, I [KB2] (A) (13)

Doz. Hans-Georg Bartel, Berlin [HGB] (A) (02)

Steffen Bauer, Karlsruhe [SB2] (A) (20, 22)

Dr. Günther Beikert, Viernheim [GB1] (A) (04, 10, 25)

Prof. Dr. Hans Berckhemer, Frankfurt [HB1] (A, B) (29)

Dr. Werner Biberacher, Garching [WB] (B) (20)

Prof. Tamás S. Biró, Budapest [TB2] (A) (15)

Prof. Dr. Helmut Bokemeyer, Darmstadt [HB2] (A, B) (18)

Dr. Ulf Borgeest, Hamburg [UB2] (A) (Essay Quasars)

Dr. Thomas Bührke, Leimen [TB] (A) (32)

Jochen Büttner, Berlin [JB] (A) (02)

Dr. Matthias Delbrück, Dossenheim [MD] (A) (12, 24, 29)

Karl Eberl, Stuttgart [KE] (A) (Essay Molecular Beam Epitaxy)

Dr. Dietrich Einzel, Garching [DE] (A) (20)

Dr. Wolfgang Eisenberg, Leipzig [WE] (A) (15)

Dr. Frank Eisenhaber, Vienna [FE] (A) (27)

Dr. Roger Erb, Kassel [RE1] (A) (33 essay Optical phenomena in the atmosphere)

Dr. Christian Eurich, Bremen [CE] (A) (Essay Neural Networks)

Dr. Angelika Fallert-Müller, Groß-Zimmer [AFM] (A) (16, 26)

Stephan Fichtner, Heidelberg [SF] (A) (31)

Dr. Thomas Filk, Freiburg [TF3] (A) (10, 15 essay percolation theory)

Natalie Fischer, Walldorf [NF] (A) (32)

Dr. Harald Fuchs, Münster [HF] (A) (Essay scanning probe microscopy)

Dr. Thomas Fuhrmann, Mannheim [TF1] (A) (14)

Christian Fulda, Hanover [CF] (A) (07)

Dr. Harald Genz, Darmstadt [HG1] (A) (18)

Michael Gerding, Kühlungsborn [MG2] (A) (13)

Prof. Dr. Gerd Graßhoff, Bern [GG] (A) (02)

Andrea Greiner, Heidelberg [AG1] (A) (06)

Uwe Grigoleit, Weinheim [UG] (A) (13)

Prof. Dr. Michael Grodzicki, Salzburg [MG1] (B) (01, 16)

Gunther Hadwich, Munich [GH] (A) (20)

Dr. Andreas Heilmann, Halle [AH1] (A) (20, 21)

Carsten Heinisch, Kaiserslautern [CH] (A) (03)

Dr. Christoph Heinze, Hamburg [CH3] (A) (29)

Dr. Marc Hemberger, Heidelberg [MH2] (A) (19)

Florian Herold, Munich [FH] (A) (20)

Dr. Hermann Hinsch, Heidelberg [HH2] (A) (22)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann, Berlin [DH2] (A, B) (02)

Dr. Georg Hoffmann, Gif-sur-Yvette, FR [GH1] (A) (29)

Dr. Gert Jacobi, Hamburg [GJ] (B) (09)

Renate Jerecic, Heidelberg [RJ] (A) (28)

Dr. Catherine Journet, Stuttgart [CJ] (A) (Essay nanotubes)

Prof. Dr. Josef Kallrath, Ludwigshafen, [JK] (A) (04 Essay Numerical Methods in Physics)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Claus Kiefer, Freiburg [CK] (A) (14, 15 Essay Quantum Gravity)

Richard Kilian, Wiesbaden [RK3] (22)

Dr. Ulrich Kilian, Heidelberg [UK] (A) (19)

Dr. Uwe Klemradt, Munich [UK1] (A) (20, essay phase transitions and critical phenomena)

Dr. Achim Knoll, Karlsruhe [AK1] (A) (20)

Dr. Alexei Kojevnikov, College Park, USA [AK3] (A) (02)

Dr. Berndt Koslowski, Ulm [BK] (A) (Essay Surface and Interface Physics)

Dr. Bernd Krause, Munich [BK1] (A) (19)

Dr. Jens Kreisel, Grenoble [JK2] (A) (20)

Dr. Gero Kube, Mainz [GK] (A) (18)

Ralph Kühnle, Heidelberg [RK1] (A) (05)

Volker Lauff, Magdeburg [VL] (A) (04)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Axel Lorke, Munich [AL] (A) (20)

Dr. Andreas Markwitz, Lower Hutt, NZ [AM1] (A) (21)

Holger Mathiszik, Celle [HM3] (A) (29)

Dr. Dirk Metzger, Mannheim [DM] (A) (07)

Prof. Dr. Karl von Meyenn, Munich [KVM] (A) (02)

Dr. Rudi Michalak, Augsburg [RM1] (A) (23)

Helmut Milde, Dresden [HM1] (A) (09)

Günter Milde, Dresden [GM1] (A) (12)

Marita Milde, Dresden [MM2] (A) (12)

Dr. Andreas Müller, Kiel [AM2] (A) (33)

Dr. Nikolaus Nestle, Leipzig [NN] (A, B) (05, 20 essays molecular beam epitaxy, surface and interface physics and scanning probe microscopy)

Dr. Thomas Otto, Geneva [TO] (A) (06)

Dr. Ulrich Parlitz, Göttingen [UP1] (A) (11)

Christof Pflumm, Karlsruhe [CP] (A) (06, 08)

Dr. Oliver Probst, Monterrey, Mexico [OP] (A) (30)

Dr. Roland Andreas Puntigam, Munich [RAP] (A) (14)

Dr. Andrea Quintel, Stuttgart [AQ] (A) (Essay nanotubes)

Dr. Gunnar Radons, Mannheim [GR1] (A) (01, 02, 32)

Dr. Max Rauner, Weinheim [MR3] (A) (15 Essay Quantum Informatics)

Robert Raussendorf, Munich [RR1] (A) (19)

Ingrid Reiser, Manhattan, USA [IR] (A) (16)

Dr. Uwe Renner, Leipzig [UR] (A) (10)

Dr. Ursula Resch-Esser, Berlin [URE] (A) (21)

Dr. Peter Oliver Roll, Ingelheim [OR1] (A, B) (15 essay quantum mechanics and its interpretations)

Prof. Dr. Siegmar Roth, Stuttgart [SR] (A) (Essay nanotubes)

Hans-Jörg Rutsch, Walldorf [HJR] (A) (29)

Dr. Margit Sarstedt, Leuven, B [MS2] (A) (25)

Rolf Sauermost, Waldkirch [RS1] (A) (02)

Matthias Schemmel, Berlin [MS4] (A) (02)

Michael Schmid, Stuttgart [MS5] (A) (Essay nanotubes)

Dr. Martin Schön, Constance [MS] (A) (14)

Jörg Schuler, Taunusstein [JS1] (A) (06, 08)

Dr. Joachim Schüller, Dossenheim [JS2] (A) (10)

Richard Schwalbach, Mainz [RS2] (A) (17)

Prof. Dr. Paul Steinhardt, Princeton, USA [PS] (A) (Essay quasicrystals and quasi-unit cells)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Stierstadt, Munich [KS] (B)

Dr. Siegmund Stintzing, Munich [SS1] (A) (22)

Cornelius Suchy, Brussels [CS2] (A) (20)

Dr. Volker Theileis, Munich [VT] (A) (20)

Prof. Dr. Gerald 't Hooft, Utrecht, NL [GT2] (A) (essay renormalization)

Dr. Annette Vogt, Berlin [AV] (A) (02)

Dr. Thomas Volkmann, Cologne [TV] (A) (20)

Rolf vom Stein, Cologne [RVS] (A) (29)

Patrick Voss-de Haan, Mainz [PVDH] (A) (17)

Dr. Thomas Wagner, Heidelberg [TW2] (A) (29)

Dr. Hildegard Wasmuth-Fries, Ludwigshafen [HWF] (A) (26)

Manfred Weber, Frankfurt [MW1] (A) (28)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Burghard Weiss, Lübeck [BW2] (A) (02)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Winter, Berlin [KW] (A) (essay neutrino physics)

Dr. Achim Wixforth, Munich [AW1] (A) (20)

Dr. Steffen Wolf, Berkeley, USA [SW] (A) (16)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jochen Wosnitza, Karlsruhe [JW] (A) (23 essay organic superconductors)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jörg Zegenhagen, Stuttgart [JZ3] (A) (21 essay surface reconstructions)

Dr. Kai Zuber, Dortmund [KZ] (A) (19)

Dr. Werner Zwerger, Munich [WZ] (A) (20)

Dr. Ulrich Kilian (responsible)

Christine Weber

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann, Berlin

The author's abbreviation is in square brackets, the number in round brackets is the subject area number, a list of subject areas can be found in the foreword.

Prof. Dr. Klaus Andres, Garching [KA] (A) (10)

Markus Aspelmeyer, Munich [MA1] (A) (20)

Dr. Katja Bammel, Cagliari, I [KB2] (A) (13)

Doz. Hans-Georg Bartel, Berlin [HGB] (A) (02)

Steffen Bauer, Karlsruhe [SB2] (A) (20, 22)

Dr. Günther Beikert, Viernheim [GB1] (A) (04, 10, 25)

Prof. Dr. Hans Berckhemer, Frankfurt [HB1] (A, B) (29 Essay Seismology)

Dr. Werner Biberacher, Garching [WB] (B) (20)

Prof. Tamás S. Biró, Budapest [TB2] (A) (15)

Prof. Dr. Helmut Bokemeyer, Darmstadt [HB2] (A, B) (18)

Dr. Thomas Bührke, Leimen [TB] (A) (32)

Jochen Büttner, Berlin [JB] (A) (02)

Dr. Matthias Delbrück, Dossenheim [MD] (A) (12, 24, 29)

Prof. Dr. Martin Dressel, Stuttgart (A) (essay spin density waves)

Dr. Michael Eckert, Munich [ME] (A) (02)

Dr. Dietrich Einzel, Garching (A) (essay superconductivity and superfluidity)

Dr. Wolfgang Eisenberg, Leipzig [WE] (A) (15)

Dr. Frank Eisenhaber, Vienna [FE] (A) (27)

Dr. Roger Erb, Kassel [RE1] (A) (33)

Dr. Angelika Fallert-Müller, Groß-Zimmer [AFM] (A) (16, 26)

Stephan Fichtner, Heidelberg [SF] (A) (31)

Dr. Thomas Filk, Freiburg [TF3] (A) (10, 15)

Natalie Fischer, Walldorf [NF] (A) (32)

Dr. Thomas Fuhrmann, Mannheim [TF1] (A) (14)

Christian Fulda, Hanover [CF] (A) (07)

Frank Gabler, Frankfurt [FG1] (A) (22)

Dr. Harald Genz, Darmstadt [HG1] (A) (18)

Prof. Dr. Henning Genz, Karlsruhe [HG2] (A) (Essays Symmetry and Vacuum)

Dr. Michael Gerding, Potsdam [MG2] (A) (13)

Andrea Greiner, Heidelberg [AG1] (A) (06)

Uwe Grigoleit, Weinheim [UG] (A) (13)

Gunther Hadwich, Munich [GH] (A) (20)

Dr. Andreas Heilmann, Halle [AH1] (A) (20, 21)

Carsten Heinisch, Kaiserslautern [CH] (A) (03)

Dr. Marc Hemberger, Heidelberg [MH2] (A) (19)

Dr. Sascha Hilgenfeldt, Cambridge, USA (A) (essay sonoluminescence)

Dr. Hermann Hinsch, Heidelberg [HH2] (A) (22)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann, Berlin [DH2] (A, B) (02)

Dr. Gert Jacobi, Hamburg [GJ] (B) (09)

Renate Jerecic, Heidelberg [RJ] (A) (28)

Prof. Dr. Josef Kallrath, Ludwigshafen [JK] (A) (04)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Claus Kiefer, Freiburg [CK] (A) (14, 15)

Richard Kilian, Wiesbaden [RK3] (22)

Dr. Ulrich Kilian, Heidelberg [UK] (A) (19)

Thomas Kluge, Jülich [TK] (A) (20)

Dr. Achim Knoll, Karlsruhe [AK1] (A) (20)

Dr. Alexei Kojevnikov, College Park, USA [AK3] (A) (02)

Dr. Bernd Krause, Munich [BK1] (A) (19)

Dr. Gero Kube, Mainz [GK] (A) (18)

Ralph Kühnle, Heidelberg [RK1] (A) (05)

Volker Lauff, Magdeburg [VL] (A) (04)

Dr. Anton Lerf, Garching [AL1] (A) (23)

Dr. Detlef Lohse, Twente, NL (A) (essay sonoluminescence)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Axel Lorke, Munich [AL] (A) (20)

Prof. Dr. Jan Louis, Halle (A) (essay string theory)

Dr. Andreas Markwitz, Lower Hutt, NZ [AM1] (A) (21)

Holger Mathiszik, Celle [HM3] (A) (29)

Dr. Dirk Metzger, Mannheim [DM] (A) (07)

Dr. Rudi Michalak, Dresden [RM1] (A) (23 essay low temperature physics)

Günter Milde, Dresden [GM1] (A) (12)

Helmut Milde, Dresden [HM1] (A) (09)

Marita Milde, Dresden [MM2] (A) (12)

Prof. Dr. Andreas Müller, Trier [AM2] (A) (33)

Prof. Dr. Karl Otto Münnich, Heidelberg (A) (Essay Environmental Physics)

Dr. Nikolaus Nestle, Leipzig [NN] (A, B) (05, 20)

Dr. Thomas Otto, Geneva [TO] (A) (06)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Ulrich Parlitz, Göttingen [UP1] (A) (11)

Christof Pflumm, Karlsruhe [CP] (A) (06, 08)

Dr. Oliver Probst, Monterrey, Mexico [OP] (A) (30)

Dr. Roland Andreas Puntigam, Munich [RAP] (A) (14)

Dr. Gunnar Radons, Mannheim [GR1] (A) (01, 02, 32)

Dr. Max Rauner, Weinheim [MR3] (A) (15)

Robert Raussendorf, Munich [RR1] (A) (19)

Ingrid Reiser, Manhattan, USA [IR] (A) (16)

Dr. Uwe Renner, Leipzig [UR] (A) (10)

Dr. Ursula Resch-Esser, Berlin [URE] (A) (21)

Dr. Peter Oliver Roll, Ingelheim [OR1] (A, B) (15)

Hans-Jörg Rutsch, Walldorf [HJR] (A) (29)

Rolf Sauermost, Waldkirch [RS1] (A) (02)

Matthias Schemmel, Berlin [MS4] (A) (02)

Prof. Dr. Erhard Scholz, Wuppertal [ES] (A) (02)

Dr. Martin Schön, Konstanz [MS] (A) (14 essay special theory of relativity)

Dr. Erwin Schuberth, Garching [ES4] (A) (23)

Jörg Schuler, Taunusstein [JS1] (A) (06, 08)

Dr. Joachim Schüller, Dossenheim [JS2] (A) (10)

Richard Schwalbach, Mainz [RS2] (A) (17)

Prof. Dr. Klaus Stierstadt, Munich [KS] (B)

Dr. Siegmund Stintzing, Munich [SS1] (A) (22)

Dr. Berthold Suchan, Giessen [BS] (A) (Essay Philosophy of Science)

Cornelius Suchy, Brussels [CS2] (A) (20)

Dr. Volker Theileis, Munich [VT] (A) (20)

Prof. Dr. Stefan Theisen, Munich (A) (essay string theory)

Dr. Annette Vogt, Berlin [AV] (A) (02)

Dr. Thomas Volkmann, Cologne [TV] (A) (20)

Rolf vom Stein, Cologne [RVS] (A) (29)

Dr. Patrick Voss-de Haan, Mainz [PVDH] (A) (17)

Dr. Thomas Wagner, Heidelberg [TW2] (A) (29)

Manfred Weber, Frankfurt [MW1] (A) (28)

Dr. Martin Werner, Hamburg [MW] (A) (29)

Dr. Achim Wixforth, Munich [AW1] (A) (20)

Dr. Steffen Wolf, Berkeley, USA [SW] (A) (16)

Dr. Stefan L. Wolff, Munich [SW1] (A) (02)

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jochen Wosnitza, Karlsruhe [JW] (A) (23)

Dr. Kai Zuber, Dortmund [KZ] (A) (19)

Dr. Werner Zwerger, Munich [WZ] (A) (20)

### Articles on the topic

Load.## For lecturers

### Lecturer tips

### Video introduction

### Activities submitted by instructors

title | Authors | level | Type | topic | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Concept questions for physics using PhET (Inquiry Based) | Trish Loeblein | Uni-Vor S II | MC | physics | ||

Games Remote Lesson ideas | Trish Loeblein | S II GS S I Uni-Vor | HA On-line | chemistry physics mathematics | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations - Inquiry based Introduction | Trish Loeblein | S I Uni-Vor S II | Practical On-line HA MC | chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations - Guided Inquiry Activity | Timothy Herzog, Yuen-ying Carpenter | Uni-Vor | HA Guided On-line | chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations - Clicker Questions | Yuen-ying Carpenter, Robert Parson, Trish Loeblein | Uni-Vor | MC | chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations HTML5 | Elyse room | S II | Practical | chemistry | ||

Alignment of PhET sims with NGSS | Trish Loeblein updated by Diana López | S I | Otherwise | physics earth sciences biology chemistry | ||

PhET Sims Aligned to the Chemistry Curriculum | Julia Chamberlain | Uni-Vor S II | Otherwise | chemistry | ||

How do PhET simulations fit in my middle school program? | Sarah Borenstein | S I | Otherwise | earth sciences physics biology chemistry | ||

SECUNDARIA: Alineación PhET con programas de la SEP México (2011 y 2017) | Diana Lopez | S I S II | Otherwise | biology mathematics chemistry physics | ||

PREPARATORIA: Alineación de PhET con programas de la DGB México (2017) | Diana Lopez | Uni-Vor S II | Otherwise | physics chemistry mathematics | ||

Preguntas de razonamiento para todas las simulaciones HTML5 | Diana Lopez | University main Uni-Vor S I S II University degree GS | discussion HA | astronomy mathematics chemistry physics | ||

MS and HS TEK to Sim Alignment | Elyse room | S II S I | Otherwise | physics biology chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations | Christoffer Becho | S II S I | Guided | chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Reactions Game | Jeff Drach | S II | Otherwise | chemistry | ||

Explore Balancing Chemical Equations | Patricia Garcia | S I | Guided | chemistry | ||

Student Guide for PhET - Balancing Chemical Equations in html5 | Brian Libby | S I S II | HA Guided | chemistry | ||

Balancing Equations PhET | Kristine McDaniel | S II | Guided | chemistry | ||

High School Chemistry 1 level Balancing Equations | laura peck | S II | Practical | chemistry | ||

Balancing Chemical Equations Inquiry Lab | Tony Tracy | S II | Practical | chemistry | ||

Moodle et PhetColorado | Claude Divoux | S II | MC Practical Guided | chemistry physics | ||

Bilanciamento di reazioni chimiche___ITALIANO | Natasha Samousenko | S II S I | Practical | chemistry | ||

Ajust equacions químiques | Miriam Pujadas | S II | HA | chemistry | ||

Atividade sobre o balanceamento de equações químicas a partir da Lei de Lavoisier | Carina Maria Rodrigues Lima, Maria Cleide da Silva Barroso | S II | demo Guided HA | chemistry | ||

Uma proposta de interdisciplinaridade | Ana Carla Pimentel Paiva Francisco Régis Vieira Alves | S I S II | Guided | chemistry mathematics | ||

Roteiro para Estudo sobre Balanceamento de Equações Químicas, Utilizando o Simulado. | Antônia Clarycy Barros Nojosa e Caroline de Goes Sampaio | S II | Guided | chemistry | ||

Balanceamento de equações químicas | Victor Augusto Bianchetti Rodrigues | S II | Guided | chemistry | ||

Balanceamento, Leis Ponderais e Modelo de Dalton | DANILO JOSE F PINTO | S II | Guided HA Practical | chemistry | ||

Rätta Kemiska Ekvationer - steg för steg | Timothy Herzog, Yuen-ying Carpenter translated by Sofia Borg | S I S II | Practical | chemistry | ||

INTRODUCCIÓN AL BALANCEO DE ECUACIONES A TRAVÉS DE UN SIMULADOR PhET. | Diana Mestra | S II | HA On-line Guided Practical demo | chemistry | ||

Balancear ecuaciones | INES VEGA FABRA | S II | Guided demo | chemistry | ||

Actividad Balanceando Ecuaciones Químicas | Mary Rivas | S II | Guided | chemistry | ||

Balanceo de ecuaciones químicas por tanteo | andis pacheco | S I | HA | chemistry | ||

Guía Balanceo de ecuaciones químicas | Andrea Ortega Fernández | S I | Guided | chemistry | ||

Balanceando Ecuaciones | Elvis Rivera | S II | Practical | chemistry |

## Global production volume of chemical and textile fibers by 2020

You need one for unrestricted access **Single account**.

Full access to 1 million statistics

Access to this and all **further statistics from 80,000 topics**

**468 € / year**

708 € / year

Show source details Show publication details

Textile fibers are made up of the total production volume of chemical, wool and cotton fibers.

Older values were partly taken from the corresponding publications from the previous year.

+Glass, ceramic & plastic industry

Plastic production worldwide and in Europe by 2019

+Top-selling chemical companies in Germany 2005-2019

+Chemical companies with the highest turnover worldwide in 2020

+Glass, ceramic & plastic industry

Use of plastic in Germany in 2019, by area of application

You can only use this statistic as a **Premium users** download.

You can only use this statistic as a **Premium users** download.

You can only use this statistic as a **Premium users** download.

As a premium user, you will receive detailed references to these statistics.

As a premium user, you will receive background information and information on the publication of these statistics.

As soon as these statistics are updated, we will notify you immediately by email.

. to include the statistics in your presentation at any time.

You can only use this function from a **Single account** to use.

These and other features in the single account:

**Full access:**

On this statistic and over 1 million other data**Considerable time savings:**

Download as XLS, PNG and PDF**Valid data:**

Including source and survey information

This function is part of our high-performance business solutions.

Contact us and enjoy full access to dossiers, forecasts, studies and international data.

Access to basic statistics only.

This statistic is in this account **not included**.

## Statistics courses

Our **Nationwide statistics courses are offered by students, doctoral candidates and staff from institutes** the opportunity to deal with the basics and advanced topics of statistics in a compact teaching block (course block). Many also use ours **Statistics revision courses**to refresh and deepen the stale statistical knowledge.

Would you like to learn or brush up on certain statistical topics in a prepared course? For high school graduates we have **Statistics preliminary courses to prepare for your studies (e.g. psychology, sociology, medicine)** on offer. For undergraduate and graduate students, we offer courses on descriptive statistics (**descriptive statistics**), to the closing statistics (**inductive statistics**), on the subject of data analysis in general and a **Intensive course for hypothesis testing**.

**Our statistics courses are available in German and English**. The English lessons are primarily designed for students and doctoral candidates who are either studying in English-speaking countries or who come from abroad and study in Germany, Austria, Luxembourg or Switzerland.

**CERTIFICATE**: After successfully participating in a statistics course, each participant receives a **Participation certificate** and after successfully passing the optional exam **Expertise certificate**!